In his book The Knowledge of the Holy, A. W. Tozer famously declared, “What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us.” This book delves into a subset of that idea; for indeed, how we treat the story of Creation and the Fall goes a long way toward dictating how we think about God’s Word—and therefore, what we think about God Himself.
John MacArthur and the Master’s College Faculty. What Happened in the Garden: The Reality and Ramifications of the Creation and Fall of Man. Abner Chou, editor. 302p., $19.99, Kregel Academic.
If that publication info above feels a bit scholarly to you, well, it is. But the effort is worth it. As editor Abner Chou puts it in the introduction, “The story of Genesis 2-3 is the foundation for the rest of the story of Scripture. Change one part of that and we shift our entire theology. Even more, theology is not just ideas … but the way we understand reality around us…. What would change when you reinterpret the opening chapters of Genesis? In a word: Everything.”
That quote sets up the framework for the entire book, written by several members of the (now) Master’s University faculty. Part 1 of the book analyzes the Genesis narrative from a variety of angles—historical, hermeneutical, biological, genetic—before finally delving into the symbolic/allegorical questions that plague much modern-day “biblical scholarship.” Depending on your viewpoint,. Grant Horner’s conclusion will either sound like Occam’s Razor or circular reasoning, but either way it cuts right to the point: “Our tendency to explain away, dehistoricize, and misread Genesis 3 is a direct result of the very thing the narrative describes in such absolutely clear terms—a literal, historical account of a Fall into spiritual blindness.” Kind of reminds me of the Baudelaire quote, “The devil’s finest trick is to persuade you that he does not exist.”
With the foundation established, the second and briefest part of the book digs into two specific theological ramifications of the Fall—namely, the doctrine of original sin and the promise of the “seed” (Messiah) in Genesis 3:15. Again, what one believes about the narrative itself is bound to dictate what they believe about these two critical pieces of the Christian faith.
Part 3, then, gets into the “worldview” issues, again from a variety of angles—human enterprise, the laws of thermodynamics, natural and divine law, psychology, gender issues, and education. In the final chapter, “A Sin of Historic Proportions” pastor and Master’s University president John MacArthur returns us to the original premise of the book:
The facts are clearly on the side of Scripture. The whole chronicle of human history proved the doctrine of original sin to be true…. The work of Christ is the remedy—the only remedy—for the failure of Adam. Adam cannot be merely a myth or an illustration. He is the living, breathing reason we are in this mess. And Christ is the only way out of it.
Again, not easy stuff—but if you’re up for it, you’ll have the opportunity to see through the “mess” more clearly for the effort.
Trusting that all is well with you and Marion. Wondering how Marion¹s family is doing.
So, I¹m curious having jumped to the incomplete conclusion and read the material in the free sample. Did this scholarly writing affirm what you believe? Cause you to reconsider what you believe? Further muddle to the nth degree what you believe? All of the above or none of the above? Despite all the scholarly discourse on this topic, are we as humans even capable of truly understanding God and his plan? Does Chou truly bring more clarity to the ³mess²?
Why is it not possible that Elohim, who created the succession of ancestors that led to Christ, did not also create the succession of evolution that led to being of Adam and his wife Eve? Does this author truly believe that evolution and Biblical scripture cannot support each other or at least co-exist? I cannot begin to phantom comprehending Our Maker who created this solar system and all the universes beyond this one. Why would I even think that I could grasp mentally, and then logically put into words, how all this was accomplished.
Missing you both, Judy
Hi Judy: I would 1) SAY “affirmed,” and 2) CLARIFY that the book is far more about the Fall and a historical Adam and Eve than specifically how they got there (although the authors clearly are on the creationist side, as am I; although I’ve never totally shut the door on a both/and option).
Pingback: The 1st Adam in the Hebrew Scriptures #5 Temptation, assault and curse – Belgian Ecclesia Brussel – Leuven